Status at a glance:
- Current Definition-of-Done Status: Stable Ratified
- We finished public review on Oct 17'th, 2021
- See here for a summary of public review feedback.
- Scalar Crypto Standardization have been Ratified
Next Definition-of-Done Status::FreezeRatification- (allows start of formal public review period)Definition of Done Status Top Sheet
Scalar Crypto Specification:
- Latest Draft Scalar Crypto Specification (v1.0.0)
- Contains feedback from public review.
Lightweight instruction set extensions for RV32 and RV64 HARTs. Proposed extensions:
- Extensions fully defined in the Scalar Crypto Specification: KZk, Zkn, Zks, Zkr, Zkne, Zknd, Zknh, Zksed, Zksh, Zkt
- Shared with the Bit-Manipulation Specification: ZkgZbkx, Zbkc, Zkb
Specification
- Latest Draft Scalar Crypto Specification (v0.9.0)
- Stable
- What's next:
- Needs translation into ASCIIDOC.
- This work is documented in issue #89
- Got a skeleton ASCIIDOC spec compiling and using the right styles.
- Converting it section by section. Not converting things which might change in opcode review yet.
- We will need to incorporate results of OpCode consistency review from Ken, once available
- The opcode and consistency review dashboard is here.
- Our ETA is currently May 15'th 2021.
- Needs translation into ASCIIDOC.
- Roadmap:
- Next version will include any feedback from opcode consistency review, plus any small cleanups and editorial work.
- aes32* and sm4* encodings will change to remove the `rt` field.
- Change aes64ks1i "rcon" immediate to "rnum".
- v1.0.0 will be the public review version.
- Next version will include any feedback from opcode consistency review, plus any small cleanups and editorial work.
Encoding/OpCode consistency review
- Opcodes and encodings proposed
- Instruction extensions (instruction groupings) proposed
- Submitted to review task group
- The Bit-Manipulation shared subsets are being reviewed first as part of Bit-Manipulation specification review
- Proposed as Zkg (clmul) and Zkb (specific crypto-required bit-manipulation commands)
- The Proposed Scalar Crypto-unique subsets are next in line for review:
- K (Krypto):
- Zkn (full NIST Suite): ZKne (NIST encrypt suite), ZKnd (NIST decrypt suite), ZKnh (NIST hash suite), Zkg, Zkb (see above)
- Zkr (random entropy source)
- Zks (full ShangMi Suite): Zksed (SM4 encrypt/decrypt suite), Zksh (SM3 hash suite), Zkg, Zkb (see above)
- K (Krypto):
- OpCode and Consistency Review page
- What's next: Respond to OpCode and Consistency Review comments, once available, and achieve consensus on any changes.
- We need to discuss the aes32* and sm4* rt encodings.
- Comments from others and Andrew particularly suggest that having distinct rd/rs1/rs2 is acceptable and that we over-estimated the importance of minimising encoding cost. We will likely be reverting to the original form of these instructions, with separate rd/rs1/rs2 before public review.Zbkb
- Instruction Group Names Diagram (click thumbnail for full-size image)
Pub
Architecture & Opcode consistency review
- The results of the review can be seen here. Scalar Crypto Arch Review Results.pdf
- After discussion within the task group, the following changes will be made to the spec, with the changes expected to land in 0.9.4 before the end of August.
- Stop overlapping the aes32 and aes64 opcodes. See riscv/riscv-opcodes#77
- Clarify the effect of misa.k
- Some updates to the entropy source and zkt detailed here.
- Miscellaneous editorial issues.
- Some downstream tasks for our group development partners now we are in public review.
Who | What | Status | Task |
---|---|---|---|
PLCT | GCC | Not started | Update extension names: Zkb → Zbkb etc. |
PLCT | GCC | Not started | Update aes32/64* encodings if applicable. |
PLCT | LLVM | Done | Update extension names: Zkb → Zbkb etc. |
PLCT | LLVM | Done | Update aes32/64* encodings if applicable. |
IIT | riscv-config | Not started | Update extension names: Zkb → Zbkb etc. |
IIT | riscv-config | Not started | Update instruction inclusion in different extensions |
IIT | riscv-arch-tests | Not started | Break up K suite into Zk* extensions |
IIT | riscv-arch-tests | Not started | Update instruction inclusion in different extensions |
Architecture Tests
- Test plan for the scalar-crypto specific instructions is available.
- Imperas have a complete set of tests, written to the existing test plan, for the scalar crypto instructions and the bitmanip instructions we borrow.
- These have been merged into the main test suite as of PR#177, with many thanks to Imperas for the contribution.
- Spike, OVPSim and Sail all agree on the test signatures.
- They form a base we can use to develop prototype implementations / Spike / SAIL / QEMU very easily and quickly.
- These have been merged into the main test suite as of PR#177, with many thanks to Imperas for the contribution.
- Upstream Spike support for enabling it to work with the K test suite is being added in PR#687.
- IIT Madras are also looking at writing the scalar crypto tests for integration into the official architectural tests repo as well.
- Agreed SoW for IITM
- They are re-implementing the tests as part of the blessed coverage and test generation tooling.
- Making good progress with the simple test patterns for scalar-crypto specific instructions A/O April 7'th '21
- We then switch over to using the IIT tests when they are finished, since they will be easier to maintain/extend going forward than the Imperas tests.
- YAML config changes for K have been merged in. See here.
- Update from IIT Madras as on 25-Oct
- Sample cgf file for Kspec ver 1.0.0-rc4 is in https://github.com/anku-anand/riscv-ctg/tree/kspec-rc4
- Status from IIT Madras as on 17-Jun:
- All test cases and coverage reports has been generated and presented.
- If there are any changes in future on these that is required in future, IIT Madras will enhance the scripts as per requirements.
- Status from IIT Madras as on 20-May:
- Real world test cases as per the test plan has been generated.
- Currently waiting for the fixed toolchain with K extension from PLCT to test the generated test cases. All the test cases are working fine when we run against the patched toolchain
- A PR has been raised with a pull request for this suite to be reviewed and merged in the riscv-arch tests github repo.
- Status from IIT Madras as on 12-May:
- Coverage report for all developed cases in CTG/ISAC has been generated and it is reported as 100%
- Currently real world test cases are being developed as per test plan and will be completed and send for review by beginning of next week
- Status from IIT Madras as on 05-May:
- Resolved issues in running the rv64ik toolchain after interacting with PLCT and compile the relevant tests generated from CTG and run them on spike
- Currently resolving issues in the running the rv64ibk toolchain. Once this is done, will generate the coverage report of the test cases built till now and share with team.
- Status from IIT Madras as on 26-Apr:
- Completed the coverage points specification for all 32-bit and 64-bit instructions
- Generated test cases from the coverage points
- Currently working on trying to install the scalar crypto enabled toolchain.
...
- Experimental / development toolchain available in the riscv-crypto repository.
- This cannot be up-streamed, but can be used for development work for now.
- Intrinsics proposal from Markku
- PLCT lab have developed complete Binutils and GCC patches.
- The pull requests into the main RISC-V repos can be found here:
- Binutils pull request: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-binutils-gdb/pull/254
- GCC pull request: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-gcc/pull/250 (merged)
- The PLCT lab continuous integration server can be found here:
- https://ci.rvperf.org/view/Krypto-Scalar/
- This is a good place to start for re-producing the PLCT builds of GCC/Binutils
- Some small changes will be needed as we move to v1.0 of scalar crypto around encodings.
- The pull requests into the main RISC-V repos can be found here:
LLVM
- Work will be done by PLTC PLCT lab under the group contributor model.
- Slides from PLCT Update Weds 10'th Feb
- As of 21'st April '21, LLVM work is mostly complete, waiting on PLCT lab for an update about merging things upstream.
- Some small changes will be needed as we move to v1.0 of scalar crypto around encodings.
- As of 24'st Jan '22, LLVM upstream is able to compile the assembly code of Zk* and Zbk*
Simulators
Though all listed under "simulators", these are actually a collection of formal model / virtual machine / architectural simulators / DV simulators etc.
...
- Currently working on getting support merged in upstream in PR#80 PR#99
- Support for all scalar-crypto dedicated instructions is present.Support for and the entropy source is still the main point of discussionpresent.
- No support for Bitmanip . The Bitmanip TG is waiting until after the opcode and consistency review to start writing SAIL code.
- This PR is "paused" until the next release of the scalar crypto spec, which will bring some functional changes to the `aes32*` and `sm4*` instructions.
- yet.
Spike
- Upstream support has been merged in as of PR#635
- Support for all of scalar crypto specific instructions and entropy source.
- The only feature left is to enable the right Bitmanip instructions when K is enabled. Currently, one must include "b" in the spike "–isa=" argument. PR#649 has now been merged. Support now consistent with v0.9.0..
- Instructions are up to date with v1.0.0
riscvOVPSimPlus
- Imperas Commercial Simulator
- Freeware version
- Support forSupports:
- Crypto-scalar v0.7.2, v0.
- 8.1, 0.9.0, 0.9.2, 1.0.0-rc1, + Bitmanip subsets
- Bitmanip 0.90, 0.91, 0.92, 0.93-draft, 0.93, 0.94, 1.0.0
- Functional coverage collection.
QEMU
- Work will be done by PLTC PLCT lab under the group contributor model.
- Github repository
- Continuous integration status
- Waiting to hear back from PLCT on status.
...