Architecture Review Committee
ARC Members
Definition of Architecture Review (AR)
AR is a structured process to ensure robust, consistent RISC-V architecture extensions align with ratified specifications and the overall RISC-V strategy. It involves reviewing architectural consistency, cost/benefit justifications, and adherence to RISC-V standards. See the AR Policy for more details.
Goals of AR
Produce consistent and high-quality architecture extensions.
Coordinate opcode, mnemonic, and CSR assignments.
Ensure responsiveness and thoroughness in reviews.
Maintain architectural consistency across extensions and profiles.
Communication Channels
tech-arch-review@lists.riscv.org: primary portal for submitting architecture extensions or key issues for review.https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-arch-review
Privileged Spec (IC) mailing list: https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-privileged
Unprivileged Spec (IC) mailing list: https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-unprivileged
Key AR Activities
Architecture Reviews:
Conducted by the Unprivileged and Privileged ISA Committees (ICs).
Reviews ensure extensions are suitable for RISC-V standardization, focusing on architectural integrity and justification.
Opcode Assignment Reviews:
Managed dynamically by IC chairs and their delegates.
CSR Assignment Reviews:
Delegated to knowledgeable individuals for thorough evaluation.
Definition of Done (DoD) Sign-offs:
Includes early opcode assignments and other deliverables as part of extension readiness milestones.
AR in the Specification Development Lifecycle
Planning/Development: Consultative role, offering guidance on architectural choices.
Freeze Stage: Mandatory review to ensure readiness for specification advancement.
Ratification-Ready Stage: Required if substantial changes have occurred in the specification.
RISC-V International